House V. NCAA settlement doesn't settle everything
Digest more
Top News
Overview
Impacts
As colleges prepare for sweeping changes tied to the NCAA's $2.8 billion NIL settlement, proposed scholarship and roster limits will dampen college opportunities for high school athletes.
BYU’s new guard has said NIL was not the driving factor in his decision to transfer. Even if that isn’t the case, Drew hopes the House vs. NCAA settlement — which was recently approved and will soon allow programs to share revenue with athletes under a $20.5 million salary cap —will bring new balance to offseasons.
Starting July 1, athletic departments will be able to compensate athletes directly from their revenues. Here's how the settlement of House v. NCAA will impact NCAA Division I schools.
Johnson v. NCAA could be a clarifying win for the organization on employment, or it could be the case that hastens dramatic changes.
Welcome to the end of amateurism—and the chaotic beginning of whatever comes next. In the wake of a landmark antitrust settlement, House v. NCAA, the college
Administrators at Villanova, Temple, St. Joe's, La Salle, and Drexel expressed optimism about the new system. As an Ivy League school, Penn could not opt in to the House settlement.
Sam Webb and Steve Lorenz talk summer NIL and NCAA settlement in Michigan LB recruiting
One of the key terms in the House v. NCAA settlement, an NIL clearinghouse is rolling out. Called NIL Go, it will vet deals worth more than $600, and there are questions about what potential punishments would look like.