A federal appeals court has handed employers a clear win on reference checks and a roadmap for defending hiring decisions ...

In Bostock v. Clayton County, the Supreme Court ruled that anti-LGBTQ discrimination violates the federal law against discrimination in the workplace. The Bostock case consisted of three cases that ...

The EEOC is taking a different approach to employment discrimination than it has in the past. But has employment discrimination changed enough to merit this new focus?

In Massey v. Borough of Bergenfield, argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Oct. 28, 2025, the parties dispute the legality of the current, employer-friendly, “background ...

The case came about as one of the first cases adhering to the Supreme Court ruling that employees aren’t required to show sustainable damage such as pay cuts, demotions or terminations to pursue ...

The racial discrimination case filed against Google states that an employee was unfairly treated and wrongfully terminated ...

(RNS) — A federal appellate court ruled in favor of World Vision, a global Christian relief and development organization, last week, saying it was justified in revoking employment of a customer ...

UPDATE: April 14, 2026: The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced on Friday it settled with a Missouri subsidiary of Republic Services for $200,000. The agreement brings an end to a ...

Most U.S. Supreme Court terms tend to include at least one significant labor and employment law decision. In 2025, the justices handed down a verdict that could prove to be one of their most ...

"The filing of systemic actions really has been downplayed and is not the main focus or emphasis by the EEOC anymore," said Gerald Maatman Jr., a Duane Morris partner. Lawsuits filed by the Equal ...

Job advertisements turn into legal minefields faster than companies realize. Innocent-looking words explode into expensive lawsuits when age-related language creeps into postings like uninvited guests ...